Automated x-ray laminography ensures through-hole joints meet barrel fill specs.
Although plated through-hole package production is a mature process,
it still results in unreliable and poor quality solder joints.
IPC-A-610 specifies that an acceptable criterion for through-hole
solder joints is that at least 75% of the barrel is filled along the
board thickness and that a bottom fillet is present. Various testing
technologies exist to ensure a sound electrical connection is created,
but automated x-ray laminography is the only available technology that
can ensure the through-hole solder joint meets the IPC-A-610
specifications of barrel fill.
The widely used technique of wave soldering the bottom side of a
board produces an effective solder joint with a strong bottom fillet.
At times, however, solder will not flow properly, falling short of the
required 75% of the barrel. This occurs if a pin is bent, contaminated
or an insufficient amount of solder paste is deposited. This is also
common when using Pb-free solder formulations, as the lower wetting
force of Pb-free solder decreases the ability for solder to fill the
hole sufficiently.
The "paste-in-hole" soldering technique (also known as
"pin-in-paste") is a relatively new process of simultaneously printing
solder paste for both SMT and through-hole packages. This technique is
used when dealing with a double-sided SMT assembly in which components
sensitive to high temperatures are used on both sides. This technique
also may leave an undesirable solder fill because of poor wetting,
insufficient amount of solder paste and no bottom fillet.
Electrical tests may be used to ensure that a connection is made
from the joint to the board. On some packages with visible joints,
visual inspection confirms that solder appears to have flowed through
the barrel. X-ray laminography is the only testing methodology
permitting measurements to be made within the barrel to ensure the
solder fill within the joint meets the required IPC specifications.
X-ray laminography inspects specific regions or "slices" along the
barrel and tests for solder presence. For each "slice" taken, a region
of interest is created around the barrel. Within this region of
interest, an average gray level value is measured representing solder
presence. The average gray level is then compared to a model average
gray level previously determined by the user. This results in
calculating a percentage to represent how close the measured solder
joint is to the known nominal average value. A pin is indicated when
the calculated percentage is less than a set threshold. For example,
anything lower than 90% of the nominal average gray level will be
indicated as insufficient.
Using this technique, an automatic test can be set up to inspect several regions within the barrel and on the board surface. Figure 1
shows an x-ray laminographic image taken at 75% barrel (right side) and
an image taken at the bottom of the board (left side). The system
determines the missing solder and joint for pin 49. For pin 51, a joint
is present, but the solder did not flow properly up the barrel,
creating an insufficient joint. The system measured at 75% barrel fill
that pin 51 is within 84% and pin 49 is within 30% of a known
satisfactory solder joint's average gray value. For both of these
joints, a present end fillet can be identified. Depending on the
manufacturing requirements, this automated test could be arranged to
catch missing and inadequate solder fill, or just the missing joint, by
adjusting the allowable percent of the measured nominal average.

Bibliography
IPC-A-610D, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies, February 2005.
Stig Oresjo, "Test and Inspection as Part of the Lead-Free Manufacturing Process," ECWC 10 Conference, IPC Apex Proceedings, February 2005.
Dr.
David Bernard and Bob Willis, "Measurement Variation in PIHR Pb-Free
Solder Joints," "Using X-Ray Inspection, the Efficacy of Pin-In-Hole
Reflow with Different Board Finishes is Studied," SMTA International Proceedings, September 2005.
Jeremy Jessen is technical marketing engineer at Agilent Technologies (agilent.com); jeremy_r_jessen@agilent.com. |