| Process Cleaning Integration |
|
|
| Written by Dr. Mike Bixenman | |||
| Monday, 31 March 2008 19:00 | |||
Removing unwanted residues is a collective undertaking.Miniaturization has a tendency to collapse the process window, reduce tolerances and stress current manufacturing processes. Cleaning methods have been of less concern to engineers because of the successful implementation of no-clean flux technologies. This trend is changing as a result of more active fluxes and localized areas of entrapped flux residue, leading to electrochemical migration and electrolytic corrosion. Figure 1 illustrates the problem. The images show a component before cleaning, after cleaning (where residue is not noticeable), and after cleaning (the view is from under the part). Projects initiated by cleaning fluid and equipment suppliers aimed to address cleaning process gaps. The chemistry suppliers focused on improved cleaning fluid designs that provide low surface tensions and wetting characteristics.2 Research into the problem indicated the cleaning fluid was not penetrating the gap to reach soil under low-standoff (<0.002") components.3,4 By reducing the droplet size of the cleaning fluid, research scientists hypothesized the cleaner would wet and penetrate tights gaps.4 ![]() As cleaning fluids have improved, engineers have also pressed the importance of process integration with the cleaning machine. Working closely with the OEMs, designed experiments (DoE) were initiated to study mechanical impingement.5 The DoE focused on fluid flow, impingement pressure, nozzle type, directional forces and time. From this work, suppliers gained knowledge for integrating the cleaning process using both innovative cleaning fluids and cleaning equipment to meet the challenge of cleaning highly dense assemblies. All this work – be it individual or jointly conducted – shares the common aim to eliminate gaps through accelerated deployment of new cleaning technology, improved cleaning equipment designs and cleaning process integration. Cleaning fluid innovations focused on low surface tension fluids provide a second benefit: The fluids had to operate at lower concentration levels.4 As such, users gain improved cleaning performance at lower operating costs. Additionally, improved cleaning equipment designs provide fluid delivery for penetrating and removing residues from low standoff components. References
Dr. Mike Bixenman is chief technical officer at Kyzen Corp. (kyzen.com); This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
|
Columns
| RoHS's Side Benefits |
I have mentioned numerous times that the first purpose of RoHS is to help make recycling easier. So RoHS was developed to support WEEE. One would imagine that, in doing this, the EU was primarily concerned with recycling in the EU. |
| Read more... |
| 2001 vs. 2009: Why Semis Did Better This Time |
The Great Recession that began in the fourth quarter of 2008, at the height of the holiday spending season, had an enormous effect on world economies in 2009. The bursting of the bubble housing market in the US resulted in the meltdown of financial institutions around the world. |
| Read more... |
Features
| Capacitor Testing Challenges and Solutions |
Chip caps are prone to leakage, so consider these test methods for minimizing electrical failures. |
| Read more... |
| 5 Issues Driving the Cost of Poor Quality |
Why common metrics fail to root out the causes, and actually add cost in the process. |
| Read more... |
Products
RMD’s LeadTracer-RoHS XRF Now for Use in Solar Apps
LeadTracer-RoHS XRF now can be used in solar applications to ensure RoHS compliance. The solder analysis and identification feature identifies all solder alloys within minutes. Addresses various...
LeadTracer-RoHS XRF now can be used in solar applications to ensure RoHS compliance. The solder analysis and identification feature identifies all solder alloys within minutes. Addresses various...



