After being given up by many for dead, business is heating up at
BTU
International. In one of the industry’s top feel-good stories, the
maker of soldering equipment has posted three straight profitable
quarters, with net sales for the first half of 2005 up 12% to $28.6
million.
The stunning turnaround comes on the heels of 14 straight money-losing
quarters, dating to March 2001. And it comes with several familiar
faces back where they were before the company’s troubles began.
In an exclusive interview with
Circuits Assembly, company officials
laid out the simple yet effective steps behind the resurgence, and
pointed to several promising signs for continued success. (The company
is exhibiting this week at AT Expo, booth 5139.)
After a string of strong quarters during the late 1990s, BTU peaked at
$99.5 million in sales in 2000. Then, like it did for much of the
industry, the gas escaped. Revenue dropped 53% to $47.1 million in
2001, and fell another 35% to $30.6 million in 2002. Losses widened. A
new president, Mark Rosenzweig, was named. Layoffs commenced. A
robotics company was acquired. Sales improved, but profits remained
elusive.
In January of 2004, the first seeds of the comeback were sown. Industry
veteran Tom Nash joined the firm as vice president of marketing. First
quarter sales jumped 65%, then another 27% in the second quarter. Still
unprofitable, however, Rosenzweig resigned. Reenter Paul van der Wansem
as chief executive officer, returning to a role he had occupied from
1979 to 2002.
The first move, van der Wansem says, was to reassemble the BTU team.
Key BTU veterans who had left or been laid off during the downturn were
located and convinced to return. Cost reductions were made in the U.S.
and China. Purchasing was moved in-house.
Some changes were more subtle. Previously, the major geographies
reported directly to Rosenzweig. But OEMs run far-flung operations,
making it near impossible for one person to manage. So to keep up with
this trend, van der Wansem named Jim Griffin global sales director,
realigning the reporting chart so that the Asia and Europe units are
under him instead. Weekly company-wide meetings were implemented. “I
didn’t want to increase the uncertainty in the company,” van der Wansem
explains.
His team in place, van der Wansem then worked on improving profits.
Sourcing of materials and production were merged into a global
operation, also under Nash. Top OEM, EMS and ODM firms in Asia were
targeted. Low-cost operations abroad were expanded. Inventories were
lowered. Equipment development times were tightened.
A new, 45,000 sq. ft. facility is being brought online in Shanghai,
with completion scheduled for the first quarter of 2006. When done, BTU
will have tripled the size of its operations there, meeting van der
Wansem’s edict to “service customers globally.”
Yet although some
competitors have essentially relocated to China, van der Wansem insists
that’s not in the cards at BTU. The company maintains about 65% of its
employees in its 150,000 sq. ft. headquarters north of Boston. “Getting
our act together in China helps us achieve a lower cost here in the
U.S.,” he says. “Our goal is to maintain manufacturing in the U.S.
Management’s goal is to figure out how to do that.”
R&D is now split between Asia and the U.S. The new Pyramax 125
reflow line was developed in just seven months, well under the typical
schedule of 18 to 24 months, says Nash, allowing that higher
temperature equipment – BTU has a growing fuel cell business – will
take longer.
Although the company supplies lines to other markets, most notably
semiconductors, SMT remains the major segment.
Importantly, BTU’s
comeback is beating the broader equipment market. Many seers had
predicted a strong upturn for 2005 as manufacturers switched to
lead-free processes, but as yet that market has not fully materialized.
While the replacement market for tin-lead soldering equipment is
growing, Nash says, North America is lagging Japan and Europe.
Through June, SMT sales were up 8% industry-wide. In its July 10k
filing, BTU attributed
the growth in net sales in the second quarter to an increase in orders
for SMT products. The company projects compound annual growth in SMT
equipment on the order of 12% through 2009, and a CAGR for bump reflow
machines of more than 30%. (The company also forecasts 19% CAGR in fuel
cells.)
Demand has come from most corners, with Brazil a pleasant surprise.
According to van der Wansem, the surge in Brazil is across the board,
with demand coming from European and North American manufacturers and
local companies. However, demand in Mexico has been erratic, the
company said. Asia is the company’s largest market, at 48.4% of sales
through June.
BTU even recently looked into a possible acquisition of another, albeit
smaller, electronics equipment provider. The deal didn’t go through,
but it’s just another sign of how far BTU has come.